The the impotence of proofreading
Here’s another performance of Taylor Mali, this time on the importance of proofreading your works.
A good laugh and yet some food for thought 🙂
Has this ever happened to you?
You work very horde on a paper for English clash
And then get a very glow raid (like a D or even a D=)
and all because you are the word1s liverwurst spoiler.
Proofreading your peppers is a matter of the the utmost impotence.
This is a problem that affects manly, manly students.
I myself was such a bed spiller once upon a term
that my English teacher in my sophomoric year,
Mrs. Myth, said I would never get into a good colleague.
And that1s all I wanted, just to get into a good colleague.
Not just anal community colleague,
because I wouldn1t be happy at anal community colleague.
I needed a place that would offer me intellectual simulation,
I really need to be challenged, challenged dentally.
I know this makes me sound like a stereo,
but I really wanted to go to an ivory legal collegue.
So I needed to improvement
or gone would be my dream of going to Harvard, Jail, or Prison
(in Prison, New Jersey).
So I got myself a spell checker
and figured I was on Sleazy Street.
But there are several missed aches
that a spell chukker can1t can1t catch catch.
For instant, if you accidentally leave a word
your spell exchequer won1t put it in you.
And God for billing purposes only
you should have serial problems with Tori Spelling
your spell Chekhov might replace a word
with one you had absolutely no detention of using.
Because what do you want it to douch?
It only does what you tell it to douche.
You1re the one with your hand on the mouth going clit, clit, clit.
It just goes to show you how embargo
one careless clit of the mouth can be.
Which reminds me of this one time during my Junior Mint.
The teacher read my entire paper on A Sale of Two Titties
out loud to all of my assmates.
I1m not joking, I1m totally cereal.
It was the most humidifying experience of my life,
being laughed at pubically.
So do yourself a flavor and follow these two Pisces of advice:
One: There is no prostitute for careful editing.
And three: When it comes to proofreading,
the red penis your friend.
Cincirily,
16 responses to “The the impotence of proofreading”
Leave a Reply to Hunter Cancel reply
AWARDS
Just English 
You made it very difficult for me to drink my coffee this morning, I was laughing so hard! 🙂
🙂 Yes! Mission complete 🙂
How did he do that with such a straight face!? I’m reblogging this. Thanks for sharing.
🙂 Glad you liked it 🙂 This teacher has an inspiration. And talent. I have to admit it 🙂
Very clever and impotent.
Now I lol-ed. 🙂 Thank you 🙂
Reblogged this on Robin Coyle and commented:
This clip about the “impotence of proofreading” made me laugh out loud. Who said proofreading isn’t fun and funny?
I marked papers at university years ago, and I read some papers like this – no joke –
To laugh or to cry… 🙂 Ok, first laugh 🙂
I laughed – hey, it wasn’t my paper
Reblogged this on Hunter's Writing and commented:
Funny.
This is HIL-ar-ious. I laughed till I choked. This happens for real? OMG.
Oh, yes, it happened and continues to happen :))
Oh, that was most masticulating! I never creamed that any parson could spay all those nerds without even gaffing at his own yolks.
I have to share that one, too!
Reblogged this on Kip's Thoughts and commented:
This is definite evidence that proofreading should be a requirement! It’s also very funny!
You bring such inspiration to your readers Robin, right after they stop laughing. You are so good for the sole! 🙂